I typed four paragraphs about Bokeh (aka the Out Of Depth of field area of pictures) before thinking better of it and deleting it. That's 60 minutes of my life I won't get back, but I've saved anybody reading this a boring five minutes. I'm not going to write about it
I'll show you what I mean
Ohhhhh Buttery Smooth Bokeh. Shame about the model |
Grave of my parents |
Diane getting in the way of my blur |
Grave of Diane's parents |
Sean
Update:
Famed Bokeh Lens
The 135mm F/2.0 L that I used for these pictures is a famed lens with Canon shooters. Lot’s of people like to get ‘Background Separation' with this lens by opening up the aperture to F/2.0.
I just like to be able to still shoot in tough light. If I take somebody out to shoot them and then begin to separate them from their background, I usually conclude that I must have taken them to the wrong place. If It’s a found picture, say in a bar or on a street, I'm obviously there because that’s the environment where the things I like to shoot are to be found, that's the environment I love. Why would I want to blur that away?
The camera and lens is a heavy old 5.5lb combo . It was twilight in late December, the light was fading, I’m not muscle bound. I shot at F/2.0 so I could get comfortable shutter speeds. The 'Bokeh', 'Background Blur' 'O.D.F' area in the pictures are a consequence of the conditions I was shooting in, not really an aesthetic choice at all.
A good read on depth
Stunning Sean, truly!
ReplyDeletewhat he said ^
ReplyDeletewho invented that stupid word anyway?
it's depth of field innit!
Too Kind, guys. I don't actually care for the pictures if I'm honest. ( A post for another day)
ReplyDeleteI believe it's Japanese, Dee - Only the h was added by english speakers to help with pronunciation.
Cheers, Sean
There are certain vintage lenses that can be adapted for the DSLR's or bridge cameras that have quite a unique style of out of focus (I'm not using that word Bokeh . . . damn! :) )
ReplyDeleteWhen I shoot things in the garden background is as important as the subject, always has been for me. Ponder, ponder . . . .
Ken